Showing posts with label loan forgiveness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label loan forgiveness. Show all posts

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Thursday, March 25 – Summer Flowering

A dead bill in another forum may smell as sweet - eventually.

Some of my legislation may not flower before we adjourn, but some of these proposals will be worked on after the session ends.

Consigning a bill to summer study often delays the inevitable, but it doesn’t have to.

I realized last fall that my bill to fund loan forgiveness for public service attorneys was not going to pass this session.

That came about when I learned that the Maryland Access to Justice Commission, an arm of the judicial branch, had crafted a bill to increase funding for the Maryland Legal Services Corporation.

That bill would be in the line ahead of mine this session, but that commission could work on my idea next. Its support would be a big boost for my idea in 2011.

A second summer study came about after the committee chairman said at the public hearing on another bill of mine that he wanted to examine in greater depth how the state allocates the money from the legal settlement with the cigarette industry.

He’s already told me I can be an active participant in that review.

So I won’t be spending the entire summer on the campaign trail or Camden Yards.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Summer 2009 - You don’t wait until January

You don’t get your bills passed if you wait until January to start working on them. If your bills are enacted, you have to keep working to make sure they’re implemented.

So ninety days into our nine-month interim, I write to discuss with you some of the issues I’m working on.

The Congress has passed two laws that create opportunities for similar action at the state level.

The sale and distribution of tobacco products will be regulated by the federal government under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. This law gives the states clear authority to regulate in this area as well. My focus will be on sales to minors and advertising directed at these potential smokers.

It will be easier for young people saddled with academic debt to enter public service under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, whose chief sponsor was Congressman John P. Sarbanes. If you work for the government or a non-profit for ten years, what you still owe on your federal student loans will be forgiven.

I sponsored the laws which created similar incentives with state funds. I will be meeting with financial aid experts to see if we should modify our programs in light of this major federal initiative.

As vice chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, criminal law is one of my responsibilities. The rash of violence perpetrated by gangs and the senseless shooting of a five-year old bystander by a teenager with a long history of offenses demand a thorough review of our existing policy. I have begun that process.

Do you have a reasonable expectation of privacy about the cell phone calls you make when you’re traveling from one place to another? Should the police be required to get a judge’s approval for a search warrant before they obtain the records of the locations where you made such calls? I think they should and will introduce a bill to require that they do so.

My green jobs bill was enacted this past session, making it a priority to train current and former welfare clients for jobs in this growing sector of the economy. I just learned that this will be a key aspect of the state’s job training efforts.

My Lilly Ledbetter bill reversed a Supreme Court decision that made it very difficult for workers to recover damages from employers who had discriminated against them because of their gender.

Justice Ruth Ginsburg wrote the dissent in this case. I had the honor of presenting her a copy of our legislation, signed by Governor O’Malley.

This was not the first time I met the Justice. She was one of my law school professors. Her class was “Sex Discrimination and the Law.”

I may get a second chance to give the Justice a bill that reverses a decision she dissented from. Last month, the Supreme Court made it very difficult for workers to win a case if they had been treated unfairly because of their age.

I welcome your thoughts about these issues or other matters of concern to you.